Dealing with Harassment and Threats on Social Media - Free Essay Example

Now the Online bullying is getting much serious. Individuals are advising people to murder themselves for posting what they dont care for. For instance, one VIP posted his or her photo and hater remarked that you should execute yourself for posting that. Yet, there are some approaches to stop this. One of the courses is to absolutely disregard the condition. Because the more you seriously you look into the situation theyre more likely to get lot toxic. The second way is that you contact the organization and disclose to them what is new with your record or report the records that are pestering you. Those organizations will make some sort of move against them. On the off chance that that doesnt help then you should attempt to enlighten the legislature regarding the circumstance that you are in, they are well on the way to enable you to get past that. First, have you at any point seen those big names who dependably complain about their hater. That is the major problem because if you pay any kind of attention to them like blocking them tweeting about them or attacking them via social media more and more of them will come to bother you. For instance, numerous VIPs get irritated each and every day except the individuals who remain close-lipped regarding it was the person who might get less feedback from their hater. That is the reason I trust that disregarding them is the most ideal approach to manage the circumstance. It may be impermanent in that time you can contact for help. The second way is that you contact Twitter to make a move. Like erase their record, transitory square them or persuade them to upgrade their system. You cant stop a huge number of people assaulting one individual. For instance, Twitter should focus on individuals who were as of late in the news for terrible allegation so they could brief impair their record. Likewise, as the circumstance quiets down they can enact their record. It will push the client to not get in any kind of sorrow. Now and then it can keep individuals from experiencing unpleasant occasions and submitting suicide. Web-based harassing can be extremely touchy particularly in the event that you are having a troublesome time in your life. Last thing is that if the comments are threatening or aggressive in any ways you can make these two strides further and report the circumstance to the police or court. It may require a long time to stop all the negative remarks in light of the fact that lawful methodology requires some serious energy. Likewise, Twitter needs to get associated with the circumstance for them to make any move. As an organization, Twitter should see every one of the issues and it may require a significant stretch of time to stop the cynicism it is probably going to work. Twitter has their principles and control to kick or square any client for all time. It is illegal to post threatening and harmful comments for example, I will execute you or slaughter yourself. The individual who remarked that may have some genuine affirmation on him. All in all, it is vital for individuals to quit despising one another. It makes an awful attitude and dangerous identity It can likewise result in you demolishing somebodys profession with your cruel words. There are individuals who consider disdainful remarks important in light of the fact that they need to enhance themselves. In any case, on the off chance that they continue getting detest they could suffer great depression or severe mental problems. It is likewise the organizations obligation to offer their clients awesome administration particularly the VIPs since they are the person who makes their item more appealing.

Significance Of Brown v. Board of Education Court Case - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 2137 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Brown v Board of Education Essay Did you like this example? The civil rights movement began because of the segregation of whites and blacks in the United States after the civil war. In result of the Civil War, the southern half of the country was in remains and the start of reconstruction was ongoing. Although slaves were already supposed to be considered freed, the racist emotion in the south was still progressing and they found ways to manipulate and torture blacks with work and little food. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Significance Of Brown v. Board of Education Court Case" essay for you Create order One of these ways was through segregation and the excuse of separate but equal in society. This problem finally grew on the nationwide view in the Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson, where the state of Louisiana had a segregation law set in place to fix the issue. Although there was already segregation laws in Louisiana, the Supreme Court supported it on a national level based on the theory that separate but equal does exist. In 1890, a new law was implemented in Louisiana this required railroads to provide equal but separate accommodations for white, and colored, races. The already enraged black community decided to test the law. On June 7, 1892, Homer Plessy was taken and jailed for sitting in the White car of the East Louisiana Railroad. Plessy was one-eighths black seven-eighths white, but according to Louisiana law, he was black by blood and history. Plessy felt as if the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments were being violated and went to court arguing that the Separate Car Act was contradicting them.   The results later coming back and starting the court cases as the judge found that Louisiana was not in the wrong and they could control railroad companies in their state; this made Plessy guilty of refusing to leave the white car. On a later date, Plessy appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, as he did not believe his punishment for actions was right, but they defended the original decision already made. In 1896 Plessy made another appearance in front of the Supreme Court of the United States for them to here in on the case and was convicted guilty once again. In result to this hearing the Separate, but equal doctrine was released.   The Separate, but equal doctrine was a legal statement in the United States constitutional law stating that racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. constitution, which guaranteed equal protection to all people. The case of Brown v. The Board of Education first began with five separate class-action lawsuits that was then joined together by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) on behalf of the colored schoolchildren and their families in Kansas, South Carolina, Delaware, Virginia and Washington, D.C. The lead plaintiff known by the name of Oliver Brown he had filed a suit against the Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas in 1951, after his daughter Linda was not granted admission to a white elementary school. Linda Brown, like many of her friends was a women of color, was allowed the privilege to go to school. However, she and her black friends were only allowed permission into a school for Blacks meaning, they were actually segregated from the white students. Therefore, taught to keep their safe space, they were then not allowed the opportunity to associate, socialize, make friends, and learn with the white students. Away from being segregated, there were comments that the schools put forward to black students never were half the standards of the schools attended by Whites when it came to books and facilities. What the law said during those times is as followed: that all schools – whether they cater to the white or the black population – should be equally equipped. That horrible situation provided the setting for Brown v. Board of Education. Linda, Browns daughter, resided only seven blocks away from a good, high standard, and well educated elementary school. Though, she had to commute everyday one mile to reach her schools location and be able to attend her classes. The reason was simple and nothing to complex, the school positioned seven blocks from her home was a school designated only for Whites. In 1950 however, her parents   made an overall decision and decided to ignore the segregation rules as stated by the school and tried to have Linda registered in the school closer to her home so that she would not have to walk a mile one way each day just to attend her classes. The problem became larger as she was directed away by the school principal who insisted on following and staying strict to the schools policy of segregation (Cozzens, 1998). Following the principal of the elementary school seven blocks from their home denied to register Linda, her father, Oliver Brown, wanted the help of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. After the principal of the elementary school blocks from her school refused to allow Linda, her father, Oliver Brown, wanted the help of the NAACP. The Topeka, Kansas branch leaded by McKinley Burnett directly took up the case because it had been excited to begin a legal challenge against the issue of segregation which was directed by white schools at the time. The NAACP brought together thirteen parents and directed them to register their twenty children in schools that were not directly for colored people. In Topeka, eighteen schools were chosen for white children while and only four of those schools were accessible to black children. When all children were denied permission to schools for Whites, the NAACP made all the parents plaintiffs in a class suit it filed in their behalf against the Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas. (Brown Foundation, 2004). Brown v. Board of Education was a breakthrough in American history, as it was the start to the long process of cultural segregation, starting with schools. Segregated schools showed so much difference in quality and standards, so African-American families organized the fight for equality. Brown v. Board stated that public schools must mix races and not separate based on color. This court decision created huge disagreement throughout the United States. Without this case, the United States may still have been segregated today. Although the Fourteenth Amendment gave certain rights to blacks, including citizenship, equal protection of laws/freedom, African-Americans were considered lesser of people by whites in this country. Justice Henry Brown wrote that the intention of the fourteenth amendment was not to abolish racial distinctions.   Nor to establish social equality, but merely to establish political equality.   Laws permitting and even requiring separation of races do not imply inferiority. This writing came up to mind after Plessy presented his case and failed one more time creating that separate, but equal doctrine. The separate but equal doctrine strengthened segregation practices in schools and throughout public life. In the 1930s, under the leadership of Charles Hamilton Houston, the NAACP, begin to attack the separate but equal doctrine.   Houston strategically focused his attacks on the realm of public education, because he felt like the detrimental effects of racial segregation were most readily visible in this area of life. Education was already so separated based off color and any money put fourth towards education or new advancements went to the whites. The road to Brown v. Board of Education was officially underway and Topeka chapter was small, but by far known as powerful. For the next two years Burnett, member of Topeka chapter, attended every single school-boarding meeting.   In fact, Burnett had no option but to save all his leave time in order to be able to be present at the board meetings, because they were held during his work hours. Since, the board refused to acknowledge, Burnetts continued requests, he decided it was time to look ahead and seek legal remedies. Burnett joined with the Scott family law firm, a local law firm with a well-established, history of filing discrimination cases through the state of Kansas. The awareness of this case grew rapidly and awareness began to grow. By the fall of 1950 they had successfully gathered 20 children who were willing to help test their case. These families were to take their children to the white school closest to their home and attempt to register and have a witness there to document what occurred. On August 3rd, 1951, the United States Court in Kansas concentrated their decision to uphold the right of the Topeka school board to maintain segregated schools.   They decided that the schools were both separate and equal. The three-judge district board did recognize the validity of the arguments stated regarding the emotional impact of state supported segregation, but with the road leading to this they could not make a ruling that opposed the Supreme Courts decision in Plessy vs. Ferguson case that was presented earlier.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   On May 17, 1954, United States Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren delivered the unanimous ruling in the landmark civil rights case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. State-sanctioned segregation of public schools was a violation of the 14th amendment and was therefore unconstitutional. The legacy of brown v. board of education that was fueled by the Civil Rights will forever be known as it was much needed for talks on racism, equality, and so much more. The Supreme Courts decision in Brown v. Board marked a outstanding moment in the NAACPs decades-long campaign to battle school segregation and how it was not right. In proclaiming school segregation as unconstitutional, the Court turned over the long-lasting separate but equal doctrine recognized in Plessy v. Ferguson many years ago leading up to Brown v. The Board of Education. In his view, Chief Justice Warren proclaimed public education was an essential right that deserved equal protection, stating plainly separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. In its memorable ruling, the Supreme Court did not insist of how to exactly end school segregation, but rather they had asked to hear further arguments and problems on the issue as they progressed. The Courts fearfulness, combined with firm local resistance, meant that the brave Brown v. Board of Education ruling did little on the community level to achieve the goal they were attempting to reach of taking segregation out of schools. Black students, to a large amount, still attended schools with cheap facilities, out-of-date textbooks and often no basic school supplies. Over 60 years after the breakthrough ruling, measuring its impact remains a complex effort. The Courts decision definitely fell short of original hopes that it would end school segregation in America for the rest of time, and some believed that bigger social and political services within the country played a far greater role in ending segregation. As the Supreme Court has grown progressively divided along political spectrums, both conservative and liberal justices have claimed the Brown v. Board to argue different sides in the constitutional debate. Chief Justice John Roberts, stating for the minority, asserted: The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. Justice John Paul Stevens then wrote that the ruling rewrites the history of one of this courts most important decisions. Today children of all color and race attended the same school. Whether it is a boarding school, private school, or a public school they all attend class in the same classrooms every day. The case of Brown v. The Board of Education has changed the education for the future generations to come! This case was very impactful to the Brown family as his daughter was in the process of applying to a public elementary and they were still being treated bad and un-humane. His case really opened the eyes of the jury to see that separation of the school was not advancing nor helping students instead just making education an inconvenience.   We are constantly reminded every day that encouraging the conjoining of schools has helped children to learn the different lives some children have to live. This makes little things be more appreciated and helps to care for the others who may not be able to provide for themselves. The jury had no clue onto how this separation was a huge impact on the world an d student. Students are now better able to learn from each other and the different features of each culture people come from. The Brown v. Board of Education was one very important revolving points in the judicial jurisprudence that backed to the overall expansion of the United States. When the choice of the Supreme Court ruled that segregation did violate the Fourteenth Amendment, the future plans concerning rights of the people were afterward shaped. Aside from helping in the maturing of our democracy, it restated the sovereign power of Americans in protecting their rights under the constitution from the arbitrary limits and restrictions imposed by state and local governments. Linda Brown, therefore, sent her message across, clearly stated for the people (Brown Foundation, 2004).

Talk Radio Censorship - 1753 Words

Over the years, talk radio censorship has become a bigger issue. The FCC (The Federal Communications Commission) has become a large part in regulating the business of talk radio due to the fact that some people impose on some of the topics or language used during the broadcasts. Many people find them offensive and should not be allowed to be broadcasted without some type of notification that it is going on or is inappropriate for children or just in general. The censorship of talk radio has become a large issue with broadcasters having â€Å"special rights† during airing, â€Å"special rights† meaning broadcasting openly about any topic, and this could be solved by not giving people who broadcast stations this power. The FCC has been monitoring large radio stations throughout the country for a long time now. This organization is a seven part group which is all run by Frank R. McNinch, who used to be the chief of the Federal Power Commission (Rockwell 217). This org anization is primarily a licensing and monitoring assembly, which has technical regulatory powers. The licenses they give out are only valid for a period of time, and then must be renewed. These licenses decide the power and coverage the station has to broadcast on (Rockwell 218). These guidelines are very strictly enforced by the FCC because of how the public has reacted to some of the situations that have occurred. The FCC has also created criteria which has a â€Å"public mandate† that they are instituting intoShow MoreRelated Freedom of Speech vs Censorship Essays1231 Words   |  5 Pagesbeginning with the First Amendment which is under constant assault by censorship. The Constitution of the United States says that â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.† Censorship as defined by Wikipedia is â€Å"the suppression of speech or deletion ofRead More Clear Channel and the Cultural and Socio-Political Ramifications of Media Consolidation6315 Words   |  26 PagesIn 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act thereby lifting restrictions on media ownership that had been in place for over sixty years (Moyers 2003; Bagdikian 2000: xviii). It was now possible for a single media company to own not just two radio stations in any given local market, but eight. On the national level, there was no longer any limit on the number of stations a company could own – the Act abandoned the previous nation-wide ownership cap of forty stations (20 FM and 20 AM). This â€Å"anti-regulatoryRead MoreEssay on Is Censorship Justified?1174 Words   |  5 PagesIs Censorship Justified? Ever wondered the reason behind racial discrimination, sexual discrimination, children committing crime or violence? The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need of censorship in the society. Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individual, groups or government officials find it objectionable, offensive or dangerous on others. There are varieties of other definitions but all have in common the conceptRead MoreThe Ways the British Government Tried to Hide the Effects of the Blitz from the British People538 Words   |  3 Pagescontinue and therefore so could the war effort and morale of the public. Many methods were used in doing this. The government used radio, newspapers, press, posters, film reels and the cinema to give information to the public, while still able to hold back any information seen to be damaging to the British war effort and morale through censorship, propaganda and distraction the government aimed to hide the effects of the blitz, and inflate British morale. Propaganda playedRead MoreThe Importance Of Media Censorship1013 Words   |  5 Pagesprovided with immediate, accurate and uncensored information. Media censorship has become a greater deal now than it ever was in centuries, because of globalization and the increasing interdependence among other nations has made censorship more harm than any good. Censorship often prevents other perspectives and point of views from being presented and in censorship or censored media and not everyones voices hurt.Media censorship limits a persons understanding, knowledge, and awareness. Which canRead MoreRay BradburyS Fahrenheit 451 Shows A Society Where, Similar1070 Words   |  5 Pagesis written in line with that same belief.   Despite the beliefs of millions, there are those who seem to think that Ray Bradbury was writing a novel, whether he knew it or not, about the dangers of censorship. Although when viewed in a modern context the novel does seem to have its fair share of censorship occurring within the plot, that does not mean that the novel s main theme now magically becomes something different from what it previously was. If that were the case, one could say that the MagnaRead MoreEssay about Censorship In Radio1334 Words   |  6 Pages  Censorship in radio For the past several years Freedom of speech in America has had it’s meaning changed many times. Although the changes have gone unnoticed by most Americans, In the radio business they are felt day in and day out. radio personalities, programmers, and owners have to deal with this everyday but they too have no real idea what the Federal Communications Commission’s idea of free speech is. You see the rule seems to change depending on who you are. If you are tagged by theRead MoreCauses Of Freedom Of Speech1343 Words   |  6 Pagesstrict towards their citizens when it comes to freedom of press and speech, they have multiple reasons behind their agitation with the problems they face dealing with it. So I’m going to talk about freedom of speech in North Korea, Cuba, and Syria. North Korea may be one the hardest countries to live in because if you talk bad about their government it is a possibility you can go to jail. Though any information on speech restrictions in the country before Arduous March is extremely difficult to find,Read MoreAnalysis Of Fahrenheit 451 : Satire Of Censorship982 Words   |  4 PagesAnalyzing Themes in Fahrenheit 451: Satire of Censorship Institution/ University Name Instructor Course Date Analyzing Themes in Fahrenheit 451: Satire of Censorship Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that has widely used satire of censorship to depict the situation in the real world whereby human beings use censorship to hide whatever they find not pleasant to expose to the masses. Due to the idea of hiding some issues from the masses, much important information and the truth is hidden from the societyRead MoreThe Power Of Censorship In Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury1122 Words   |  5 Pages A novelist, John Mortimer, once said â€Å"I suppose that writers should, in a way, feel flattered by the censorship laws. They show a primitive fear and dread at the fearful magic of print.† John Mortimer thinks that in most of the writer’s books, it shows a bit of too much truth and meaning that could cause people to express differently of the books and others. In addition to his words, the way the government works, and how society may take its toll on themselves or several people slowly of what they

Accounting for Lease

Questions: Owing to low liquidity, Lisa Ltd decides on 1 July 2015 to sell its land and buildings to Anderson Ltd. The carrying values of the land and buildings in the books of Lisa Ltd, at 1 July 2015, are: Buildings, at cost Accumulated depreciation The land and buildings are sold for $4334 700 (their fair value), with the amount being allocated equally as follows: Land $2167350 Buildings $2167350 Immediately following the sale, Lisa Ltd decides to lease back the land and buildings from Anderson Ltd. The term of the lease is 20 years. The implicit interest rate in the lease is 12 per cent. It is expected that the buildings will be demolished at the end of the lease term. The lease is non-cancellable, returns the land and buildings to Anderson Ltd at the end of the lease, and requires the following lease payments: Payment on inception of the lease on 1 July 2015 $600000 Payment on 30 June each year starting 30 June 2016 $500000 There is no residual payment required REQUIRED a. Provide the entries for the sale and leaseback in the books of Lisa Ltd as at 1 July 2015. b. Provide the entries for the purchase and lease in the books of Anderson ltd as at 1 July 2015 c. Provide the entries in the books of Lisa Ltd as at 30 June 2025. d. Provide the entries in the books of Anderson Ltd as at 30 June 2025. Answers: The initial step is to undergo the calculation for ascertaining the gain/losses realised by the company due to the sale and lease back arrangement. It is imperative to note that on land there is no depreciation, hence all the accumulated depreciation that is represented in on account of buildings only. Lands carrying value = $ 1,800,000 Lands selling value = $ 2,167,350 Capital gain realised on land = 2167350 1800000 = $367,350 Buildings carrying value = $ 1,750,000 - $350,000 = $1,400,000 Buildings selling value = $ 2,167,350 Capital gain realised on building = 2167350 1400000 = $767,350 The assets in the case given are of different nature as explained above. Hence, the land lease is operating lease while the building lease is financial lease in nature. The key reasoning for the above classification is the fact that at the termination of the lease period, the destruction of buildings take place while the land continues to remain intact. The requisite journal entries for Lisa Ltd are shown below. The requisite journal entries for Anderson Ltd are shown below.The depreciation on buildings on an annual basis = 2167350/20 = $ 108,367.5 Additionally, the realisable gains due to the buildings = 767350/20 = $ 38,367.5 The requisite journal entries for Lisa Ltd are shown below.The requisite journal entries for Anderson Ltd are shown below.